<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Dialectic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.born2synthesize.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.born2synthesize.com</link>
	<description>My daily struggle to uncover knowledge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 18:42:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Barton Doesn&#8217;t Matter (and Does) by History and the Culture Wars &#124; All Things Michael Miles</title>
		<link>http://www.born2synthesize.com/2012/08/why-barton-doesnt-matter-and-does/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>History and the Culture Wars &#124; All Things Michael Miles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 18:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.born2synthesize.com/?p=1925#comment-187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] [2] Barton, a controversial figure for years, recently had his book The Jefferson Lies pulled from the shelves by publisher Thomas Nelson due to the number of falsehoods discovered in the text. Works like The [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [2] Barton, a controversial figure for years, recently had his book The Jefferson Lies pulled from the shelves by publisher Thomas Nelson due to the number of falsehoods discovered in the text. Works like The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Barton Doesn&#8217;t Matter (and Does) by History and the Culture Wars &#124; The Dialectic</title>
		<link>http://www.born2synthesize.com/2012/08/why-barton-doesnt-matter-and-does/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>History and the Culture Wars &#124; The Dialectic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 13:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.born2synthesize.com/?p=1925#comment-186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] [2] Barton, a controversial figure for years, recently had his book The Jefferson Lies pulled from the shelves by publisher Thomas Nelson due to the number of falsehoods discovered in the text. Works like The [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [2] Barton, a controversial figure for years, recently had his book The Jefferson Lies pulled from the shelves by publisher Thomas Nelson due to the number of falsehoods discovered in the text. Works like The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pulled Pork as an Historical Event by History and the Culture Wars &#124; The Dialectic</title>
		<link>http://www.born2synthesize.com/2012/08/pulled-pork-as-an-historical-event/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>History and the Culture Wars &#124; The Dialectic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 22:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.born2synthesize.com/?p=1951#comment-185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] whimsical look at the differences between historical events and history, see my previous blog post, &#8220;Pulled Pork as a Historical Event.&#8221; [2] Barton, a controversial figure for years, recently had his book The Jefferson Lies pulled from [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] whimsical look at the differences between historical events and history, see my previous blog post, &#8220;Pulled Pork as a Historical Event.&#8221; [2] Barton, a controversial figure for years, recently had his book The Jefferson Lies pulled from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Future of Imperialism by Thank You Sarah Palin? &#187; The Dialectic</title>
		<link>http://www.born2synthesize.com/2012/04/the-future-of-imperialism/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Thank You Sarah Palin? &#187; The Dialectic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 19:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.born2synthesize.com/?p=1731#comment-174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Sarah Palin?  &#160;Smarmy Politics?, The Radical Right &#160;Add comments   May 232012  &#160;   Last month I wrote about my concern that the American right would focus the machinery of imperialism on domestic [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sarah Palin?  &nbsp;Smarmy Politics?, The Radical Right &nbsp;Add comments   May 232012  &nbsp;   Last month I wrote about my concern that the American right would focus the machinery of imperialism on domestic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Napolitano Flunks History by It&#8217;s the Constitution, Stupid &#187; The Dialectic</title>
		<link>http://www.born2synthesize.com/2011/04/napolitano-flunks-history/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s the Constitution, Stupid &#187; The Dialectic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 00:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.born2synthesize.com/?p=1467#comment-151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] debt. In essence, they want to return to the days of the Articles. This isn&#8217;t the first time the right wing has dissed the Constitution. When are we going to call out their hypocrisy?       Posted by admin at 7:59 pm Tagged with: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] debt. In essence, they want to return to the days of the Articles. This isn&#8217;t the first time the right wing has dissed the Constitution. When are we going to call out their hypocrisy?       Posted by admin at 7:59 pm Tagged with: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Illegal Fed by chris graviss</title>
		<link>http://www.born2synthesize.com/2011/04/the-illegal-fed/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>chris graviss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 20:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.born2synthesize.com/?p=1500#comment-133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike, you have drunk the kool-aid (a different flavor than mine, anyway)

You need to read &quot;The Creature from Jeckyll Island&quot;, the definitive hx of the Fed.  The fed was created by bankers, mostly international, to gain a banking monoploy.  That it was to dampen the business cycle and moderate banking crises was a well planned ruse.  The fed has totally failed in their (official) mission to stabilize the economy, reign in inflation, and prevent currency crises.  They have completely succeded in their real mission to enrich bankers, at the expense of taxpayers.

&quot;But even more important, why get rid of the central bank?&quot;... is it really a Central Bank?

&quot;Considering the financial turmoil that we experienced after the Second Bank of the United States’ charter expired, who really wants to live through that again? That seems like a game of financial Russian roulette.&quot;....  Was that really worse than the turmoil we&#039;ve lived through under the Fed?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, you have drunk the kool-aid (a different flavor than mine, anyway)</p>
<p>You need to read &#8220;The Creature from Jeckyll Island&#8221;, the definitive hx of the Fed.  The fed was created by bankers, mostly international, to gain a banking monoploy.  That it was to dampen the business cycle and moderate banking crises was a well planned ruse.  The fed has totally failed in their (official) mission to stabilize the economy, reign in inflation, and prevent currency crises.  They have completely succeded in their real mission to enrich bankers, at the expense of taxpayers.</p>
<p>&#8220;But even more important, why get rid of the central bank?&#8221;&#8230; is it really a Central Bank?</p>
<p>&#8220;Considering the financial turmoil that we experienced after the Second Bank of the United States’ charter expired, who really wants to live through that again? That seems like a game of financial Russian roulette.&#8221;&#8230;.  Was that really worse than the turmoil we&#8217;ve lived through under the Fed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Culture Warriors and the Enola Gay by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.born2synthesize.com/2011/03/culture-warriors-and-the-enola-gay/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2011 14:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.born2synthesize.com/?p=1333#comment-70</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, I&#039;m suggesting that culture warriors who attack content instead of process undermine the expansion and open debate of knowledge. Even if they happen to get it right on occasion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I&#8217;m suggesting that culture warriors who attack content instead of process undermine the expansion and open debate of knowledge. Even if they happen to get it right on occasion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Culture Warriors and the Enola Gay by c graviss</title>
		<link>http://www.born2synthesize.com/2011/03/culture-warriors-and-the-enola-gay/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>c graviss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2011 14:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.born2synthesize.com/?p=1333#comment-69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you suggesting that no-one on the left ever leans on their dogma, and fails to objectively observe facts and data, or injects their beliefs into their analyses?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you suggesting that no-one on the left ever leans on their dogma, and fails to objectively observe facts and data, or injects their beliefs into their analyses?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Life Without Unions by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.born2synthesize.com/2011/03/life-without-unions/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 19:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelrobertmiles.com/blogs/?p=872#comment-47</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for responding. I&#039;m glad you had the choice between union and non-union jobs. Particularly if you felt like the working conditions of you previous job were unacceptable.

I believe that it is important to view policy decisions made today in a larger historical context, otherwise we can&#039;t use the wisdom of the past to improve the present day. The situations that I included in my post reflect a lack of respect for workers on the part of employers, and there is no reason to think that tomorrow will be any different. So I must disagree with you that looking to the past is ridiculous.

Finally, I ask you: if owners are allowed to freely associate and negotiate as one entity named &quot;management&quot;, then why shouldn&#039;t workers be allowed to do the same? You call yourself a Tea Partier, does that mean that you are opposed to oppression? Doesn&#039;t the ability of workers to organize and collectively bargain help balance power and prevent oppression?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for responding. I&#8217;m glad you had the choice between union and non-union jobs. Particularly if you felt like the working conditions of you previous job were unacceptable.</p>
<p>I believe that it is important to view policy decisions made today in a larger historical context, otherwise we can&#8217;t use the wisdom of the past to improve the present day. The situations that I included in my post reflect a lack of respect for workers on the part of employers, and there is no reason to think that tomorrow will be any different. So I must disagree with you that looking to the past is ridiculous.</p>
<p>Finally, I ask you: if owners are allowed to freely associate and negotiate as one entity named &#8220;management&#8221;, then why shouldn&#8217;t workers be allowed to do the same? You call yourself a Tea Partier, does that mean that you are opposed to oppression? Doesn&#8217;t the ability of workers to organize and collectively bargain help balance power and prevent oppression?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Life Without Unions by tessa</title>
		<link>http://www.born2synthesize.com/2011/03/life-without-unions/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>tessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 18:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelrobertmiles.com/blogs/?p=872#comment-46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a response to all your union posts. I worked for 5 years as a nurse for at a mandatory union membership, city job. It was the worst job I ever had, the only thing good about it was that it had such cheap health insurance. My private job I was paying 100 dollars per week for family and this job was 16 dollars per week. I was  a good employee and had accumulated much sick time. My last day, people were shocked that I bothered to show up. I however, had a work ethic and thought that was normal to show up for my job. The patients were wonderful but the staff morale sank to the lowest common denominator. It is an incidious mindset of the least shall push down the best.  The work conditions were horrible as most people were more concerned with your work than their own, a sick, sick, mindset. As a single mother of 3 who has never taken a dime from the government, I now pay 175 per week for family health insurance. I am so happy to be away from that sick mindset. The problem now is I am taxed more to pay for other people to have better, more inexpensive insurance than myself. I happily work 60 hours per week to support my kids, however I resent being taxed at a sickening rate so that other&#039;s can work 30 hours per week with better insurance and better pension. I never want to work for a union again, as the level of work sinks to the lowest common denominator. This is not rocket science and it is crazy to us tea partiers that the left does not get it. We happily work harder so we don&#039;t have to support Democratic candidates. Some of us believe that abortion is morally wrong. Someday, I may be your nurse and you would be happy to have me, but if you knew my beliefs you would hate me. I however do not hate you, I feel sorry for you, because you don&#039;t understand that wealth is not created by unions, it is created by free enterprise. PS When you state working conditions from 100 years ago as the reason to keep unions, then you are just being ridiculous.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a response to all your union posts. I worked for 5 years as a nurse for at a mandatory union membership, city job. It was the worst job I ever had, the only thing good about it was that it had such cheap health insurance. My private job I was paying 100 dollars per week for family and this job was 16 dollars per week. I was  a good employee and had accumulated much sick time. My last day, people were shocked that I bothered to show up. I however, had a work ethic and thought that was normal to show up for my job. The patients were wonderful but the staff morale sank to the lowest common denominator. It is an incidious mindset of the least shall push down the best.  The work conditions were horrible as most people were more concerned with your work than their own, a sick, sick, mindset. As a single mother of 3 who has never taken a dime from the government, I now pay 175 per week for family health insurance. I am so happy to be away from that sick mindset. The problem now is I am taxed more to pay for other people to have better, more inexpensive insurance than myself. I happily work 60 hours per week to support my kids, however I resent being taxed at a sickening rate so that other&#8217;s can work 30 hours per week with better insurance and better pension. I never want to work for a union again, as the level of work sinks to the lowest common denominator. This is not rocket science and it is crazy to us tea partiers that the left does not get it. We happily work harder so we don&#8217;t have to support Democratic candidates. Some of us believe that abortion is morally wrong. Someday, I may be your nurse and you would be happy to have me, but if you knew my beliefs you would hate me. I however do not hate you, I feel sorry for you, because you don&#8217;t understand that wealth is not created by unions, it is created by free enterprise. PS When you state working conditions from 100 years ago as the reason to keep unions, then you are just being ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
